I doesn't have to. The limit of braking is the limit of adhesion between the tires and the road. If the brakes alone cannot apply enough force to the wheels to bring them to that limit, then supplementary braking from another source may improve braking. But if the brakes can bring the wheels to that limit -- that is, if they can lock the wheels -- then there is not anything more than any other source of braking can add to that.JackBauer wrote:I don't see how the hell using engine braking whilst braking will not improve braking distance. It has to.
In almost any emergency situation, however, steering is more important than stopping. Unless the emergency is that someone has built a concave brick wall across the highway such that your car is an equal distance from that wall in all directions, your chances of avoiding a collisions depend more on steering than they do on braking. Taking your hands off the wheel to change down to possible marginally increase braking force, at the expense of giving up 50% of your steering control, is just a bad bargain. So is paying attention to anything other than steering.
Steering is more important to accident avoidance than braking. That is why ABS represents a good trade-off. Even in situations where it increases braking distance, it maintains steering control, allowing you to steer around the obstacle. (This is why I say that part of defensive driving is to be constantly planning your escape route. You are more likely to steer away from an obstacle if you have maintained 360 awareness and planned where you would steer if an emergency happened.)