IMBoring25 wrote: ↑Thu May 26, 2022 12:06 am
Ridiculous. Nothing innovative about that, and no expensive time in the lab to discover the operating principle. Obvious to a four-year-old. That should be laughed out of the patent office.
I used to think that only profound ideas are patented.
Then, I came across simple ideas that I had "Invented", but found that someone else had patented them.
That's when my thinking about patents began to change.
After going through the process, I now know that for patents issued in the name of a big corporation, almost anyone involved with the idea is listed on the patent. I had thought that it was only the actual person or small group of people that conceived of it. No, the person(s) that made a formal drawing of the inventors sketch, any and all supervisors, managers, etc. of "The Team",.....I'm surprised that the lunch ladies in the corporate cafeteria were not included.
Now, when I see that someone has hunnertz of patents to their name, I don't assume that those ideas were all the brain-farts of that particular person.
Corporations like to lock up ideas to prevent their use by competitors. There was a guy named George Selden that patented the concept of the automobile in 1895 and he made some money on it for a while:
" Henry Ford, owner of the Ford Motor Company, founded in Detroit, Michigan, in 1903, and four other car makers resolved to contest the patent infringement suit filed by Selden and EVC. The legal fight lasted eight years, generating a case record of 14,000 pages. Ford's testimony included the comment, "It is perfectly safe to say that George Selden has never advanced the automobile industry in a single particular...and it would perhaps be further advanced than it is now if he had never been born."[6]
The 1906 Krebs testimony in the Selden case
The case was heavily publicized in the newspapers of the day, and ended in a victory for Selden. In his decision, the judge wrote that the patent covered any automobile propelled by an engine powered by gasoline vapor. Posting a bond of US$350,000, Ford appealed, and on January 10, 1911, won his case based on an argument that the engine used in automobiles was not based on George Brayton's engine, the Brayton engine which Selden had improved, but on the Otto engine.
This stunning defeat, with only one year left to run on the patent, destroyed Selden's income stream."