Reverse lockout

General discussion about cars. Looking to buy a new car? Have a great driving story? Post it here!
User avatar
Boston Fit
Senior Standardshifter
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: People's Republic of Massachusetts

Re: Reverse lockout

Post by Boston Fit »

Glad to hear that the lockout ring is alive and well. Along with the push-down mechanism, the ring seems like it would be the most secure type of lockout.

Shadow: The MINI Cooper (second gen, anyway) does not have to be pushed down; you just need to pull the shifter over to the left of 1st, past a friction point. This makes it too easy to engage reverse by accident, I've found.

InlinePaul: Actually, the video you posted here illustrates the ultimate reverse lockout - a separate lever!

rml605 and bk7794, your Acura/Honda shifters are probably similar to mine. I've found that the path to reverse (in both my old Fit and my current Civic) is slightly diagonal, like so. Give it a try and see if it helps.


Image
2013 Honda Civic Si
User avatar
ClutchFork
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 1941
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:55 pm
Cars: 2008 Fusion 2.3L manual
Location: Detroit MI

Re: Reverse lockout

Post by ClutchFork »

Boston Fit wrote:
InlinePaul: Actually, the video you posted here illustrates the ultimate reverse lockout - a separate lever!
I wondered about that until it struck me, what if some goofball yanks the lever while you are cruising down the road? ("What's this lever do, pull out the ash tray?" Yank. Crunch, grind, smash! :lol: ) It's nice, but weird, think I'd mount that lever on the left to keep curious hands off of it.

But I do like it for converting a tree shifter to 4 speed!
Stick shiftin since '77
theholycow wrote:Why in the world would you even want to be as smooth as an automatic? Might as well just drive an automatic...
User avatar
Boston Fit
Senior Standardshifter
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: People's Republic of Massachusetts

Re: Reverse lockout

Post by Boston Fit »

Well, maybe that explains why it didn't catch on :-)
2013 Honda Civic Si
rei
Junior Standardshifter
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 11:07 pm

Re: Reverse lockout

Post by rei »

My Fit's reverse is just below 5th, I believe it's a friction lockout preventing you from going 5-R on a rushed downshift (I've 'tested' this by mistake) I think the lockout works by requiring the stick fully centred and might need a double clutch to engage, I'll play around with it with the engine off and see what does and doesn't work (I know the lockout works when it's off on some level - I have to depress the clutch to move to R when parked, which I do not in any other gear.
2013 Fit Sport 5MT. Nothing looks funnier than a sticker advertising SOHC
Image
User avatar
Squint
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 3390
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:44 pm
Location: KY

Re: Reverse lockout

Post by Squint »

The Scion tC (and I think the FR-S is the same way... though haven't driven one as recently as tC) uses a pull-up-ring-on-shifter style.

Image

In that pic, you pull up on the silver ring below the knob. Not the best picture, but quick google result.
'15 Mazda 3 iSport Hatch 6MT
'11 Ford Fiesta Hatchback SE 5MT
'14 Giant Escape City 24MT
'97 Honda Civic EX 4AT - Retired @ 184,001 mi

For Pony!
Rope-Pusher
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 11615
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:44 pm
Cars: '08 Jeep Liberty
Location: Greater Detroit Area

Re: Reverse lockout

Post by Rope-Pusher »

rei wrote:My Fit's reverse is just below 5th, I believe it's a friction lockout preventing you from going 5-R on a rushed downshift (I've 'tested' this by mistake) I think the lockout works by requiring the stick fully centred and might need a double clutch to engage, I'll play around with it with the engine off and see what does and doesn't work (I know the lockout works when it's off on some level - I have to depress the clutch to move to R when parked, which I do not in any other gear.
Sliding idler Reverse gear needs the input shaft to be free to rotate, but all your forward gears are synchromesh and don't - although engagement may be easier/smoother with the clutch pedal depressed as well.
It is very common that when Reverse is opposite of 5th gear position, there is a blocking device in the transmission that prevents 5>Reverse shifts. Once you shift forward from the Neutral gate into 5th, the blocker is set and you can't pull the shifter straight back into Reverse. At work, we called this "The Mitsubishi Method", but I don't know if Mitsubishi invented it.

I've also seen where, even when using the Mitsubishi Method, a blocker at the shifter with a lift-ring release is also included. This will prevent inadvertently shifting from 4th to Reverse. I once thought of this as a "Belt AND Suspenders" approach, but 4>6 is a common skip-shift for 6-speed drivers and someone may attempt this on a 5-speed car if they regularly drive 6-speeds.
'08 Jeep Liberty 6-Speed MT - "Last of the Mohicans"
User avatar
Tups
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:37 am
Location: Suomi Finland Perkele

Re: Reverse lockout

Post by Tups »

Push-down in the Escort, friction(?) in the Focus.
2007 Ford Focus ST225
1982 Ford Escort Mk3
User avatar
kamesama980
Senior Standardshifter
Posts: 238
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:38 pm
Location: Columbus, IN

Re: Reverse lockout

Post by kamesama980 »

Firebird (like the GTO mentioned earlier) has an electronic solenoid that blocks R when going over 5mph. since the solenoid is fail-safe (no power=gate closed) reverse is a pain to engage when the cars off too but you can. If I'm skipping gears I usually do 1-3-5-6. It's geared kinda long so 2nd is a stretch and 5-6 shift is as much of a rev-drop as any 2 other gears thanks to the .5:1 ratio of 6th in that T56.

My truck, like most older toyotas, uses what I found today is the mitsubishi method of a mechanical lockout from 5th but it's open otherwise.
-Russ
2012 Nissan Frontier 4.0l M6 4x4
1990 Toyota Cressida 3.0l M5
1994 Pontiac Firebird LT1 M6
1970 Volkwagen Beetle M4
1990 Suzuki VX800 SM5
ashowofhands
Junior Standardshifter
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:54 pm
Cars: 2003 Outback (dad's)
Location: West Hartford, CT

Re: Reverse lockout

Post by ashowofhands »

Boston Fit wrote:
• I've seen old shifters with a ring right under the knob that you have to pull up as you're shifting into reverse.
My friend's '03 Saab 9-3 (5-speed) and my dad's '12 Subaru Outback (6-speed) both have this.

My '08 Outback locks you out if you're going more than a couple miles an hour, but there's no collar or ring or pushing down or pulling up of any sort. Not that it needs it, it's difficult enough to get that transmission into R even at a complete stop...
User avatar
zenfiz6
Senior Standardshifter
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 3:40 pm
Cars: 2011 Audi A4 6MT
Location: Newport News, VA

Re: Reverse lockout

Post by zenfiz6 »

Shadow wrote:
Boston Fit wrote: • Modern BMW's and MINI's place "R" to the left of "1," separated by a friction point that is not always effective. With these shifters, it's possible to accidentally get into reverse when you want first.
I don't know about Mini, but the BMWs that I've owned require the shifter to be pushed down slight as it is moved left & up to engage reverse. My Audi is the same way...and I believe that's true with most German cars. It's basically impossible to engage reverse by accident, since you don't push down on the shifter to go into first gear.
Yep. 2011 A4 is the same: push-down to get into R (which is to the left of 1st gear).
2013 -- Present: 2011 Audi A4 6MT (45k---???)
2001 -- 2013 .... 1999 Honda Accord AT (RIP 239k)
1999 -- 2005 .... 1987 Acura Legend 5MT (RIP 174k)
Post Reply