~4000rpm at 80mph?
~4000rpm at 80mph?
Is that normal for this car?
I have a '04 Civic Ex that I've been learning on for the past couple of months. My day-to-day life doesn't usually take me on highways, but a few days ago I got to see how this car feels at 80mph. I was sorta surprised that to maintain 80mph the rpms were about 4000 or 4100 which, to me, seemed a bit excessive. Let alone, a bunch more engine noise. To compare, my girlfriends automatic Toyota Matrix is quieter at those speeds and my old car, an automatic Honda del Sol, did that speed at about 3500 rpms.
Since then I wondered why I don't have a sixth gear. Just seems logical to me. An extra gear and the rpms would be lowered. What I finally found out is that the top gear in cars with either 6 gears or 5 gears typically have the same ratio. With 6 gear cars, the 1-5 is simply spaced closer.
So, is 4000 rpms normal to maintain 80mph? Are manuals normally a bit more noisy and run at higher rpms than their automatic counterparts in "crusing gear"?
thanks..
sean
I have a '04 Civic Ex that I've been learning on for the past couple of months. My day-to-day life doesn't usually take me on highways, but a few days ago I got to see how this car feels at 80mph. I was sorta surprised that to maintain 80mph the rpms were about 4000 or 4100 which, to me, seemed a bit excessive. Let alone, a bunch more engine noise. To compare, my girlfriends automatic Toyota Matrix is quieter at those speeds and my old car, an automatic Honda del Sol, did that speed at about 3500 rpms.
Since then I wondered why I don't have a sixth gear. Just seems logical to me. An extra gear and the rpms would be lowered. What I finally found out is that the top gear in cars with either 6 gears or 5 gears typically have the same ratio. With 6 gear cars, the 1-5 is simply spaced closer.
So, is 4000 rpms normal to maintain 80mph? Are manuals normally a bit more noisy and run at higher rpms than their automatic counterparts in "crusing gear"?
thanks..
sean
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 8574
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:59 pm
- Cars: '07 Mazda3, '06 Ninja 636
- Location: Orlando, FL
- Contact:
I'm not sure what gear you are in at 4000 RPMs at 80 MPH, but if its 5th, for a Civic, that seems normal. Those little engines have to really roar in order to keep it up in 5th. And the Matrix has a slightly larger engine and different gearing. Also, your girlfriend's Matrix is an automatic, which may aid in the lower RPMs.
To end this, do 70 MPH. You'll get there a minute later and avoid a lot of tickets. And its much better on gas!
To end this, do 70 MPH. You'll get there a minute later and avoid a lot of tickets. And its much better on gas!
2007 Mazda3
Mods: 15% tint, Eibach ProKit
2006 Ninja 636
Mods: NOS & sidecar
Mods: 15% tint, Eibach ProKit
2006 Ninja 636
Mods: NOS & sidecar
-
- Master Standardshifter
- Posts: 7337
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 9:52 am
- Cars: 05 Mazda 3 GT
- Location: Hiding behind the dancing Peter Griffin
- Contact:
4000 seems normal for a civic. In my 01' civic Si, US model Ex, going 120km/h, about 75mph, it revs at around 3.7-3.8K. Thats on 5th of course. Automatics seem to have longer gear ratios, thats why your gf's matrix goes at a lower rpm. The reason behind that is because auto's are trying to match teh fuel efficency of a manual car. And in order to do that, they need a longer gear. By lengthening the gear, the rpms can stay low.
Does your civic have a modded/aftermarket exhaust, mine does and at 75mph, in a lightly soundproofed cabin, its not fun...
btw, it's not one of those annoying buzzing exhaust fart-cans if your thinking about it... I'm not a ricer...
Does your civic have a modded/aftermarket exhaust, mine does and at 75mph, in a lightly soundproofed cabin, its not fun...
btw, it's not one of those annoying buzzing exhaust fart-cans if your thinking about it... I'm not a ricer...
-
- Junior Standardshifter
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 11:35 pm
4000rpm at 80mph?
Hello there, I am new to this forum.
Now, for rpms at 4000 when going 80mph, I wouldn't know. That all has to depend on the engine of the car. In my corolla, at 75mph, the rmps are at 2900-3000RPM. Mind you it is a manual transmission. See, every car drives differently. My mazda mx6 (1990) was different to my accord ex (1992), especially on uphills, the accord seemed to lag, compared to my mazda. Now tha was confusing, since i was used to one car, and then I had to remember, which car drove a certain way..Anyhow, do not worry.........go at a lower speed, and you will save on mpg.
Now, for rpms at 4000 when going 80mph, I wouldn't know. That all has to depend on the engine of the car. In my corolla, at 75mph, the rmps are at 2900-3000RPM. Mind you it is a manual transmission. See, every car drives differently. My mazda mx6 (1990) was different to my accord ex (1992), especially on uphills, the accord seemed to lag, compared to my mazda. Now tha was confusing, since i was used to one car, and then I had to remember, which car drove a certain way..Anyhow, do not worry.........go at a lower speed, and you will save on mpg.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 3418
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 5:01 pm
- Location: OK, USA
As the popularity of the manual transmission as a cost-saving measure has declined, the pool of manual-transmission buyers has become dominated by enthusiasts. As such, manufacturers have progressed from offering manuals using their natural advantages for benefits in both acceleration and fuel economy to offering manuals using their natural advantages almost exclusively to better performance, which entails more aggressive gear ratios that result in higher cruising RPM's and comparatively poorer mileage.
It's not the nature of the beast. It's the nature of the business.
It's not the nature of the beast. It's the nature of the business.
-
- Senior Standardshifter
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 4:42 pm
- Location: Kalifornien
- Contact:
coolguy, I noticed that lots of new cars with smaller engines <2L come with the manual as a standard. Almost all 2.0L Foci are manual, New Beetles are mostly manual, Golfs, Jettas, not to mention Civics. Also, these days it is not rare to see a girl's car eqiped with the manual tranny. On the other hand, look at a 1.5L manual Chevy Aveo (the only US-made car that comes with side repeaters ) I really doubt that this car designed solely for driving enthusiasts. Yet, almost all Aveos that are sold in the US are manual. I really hope that more and more usual people will buy manuals and finally we will become like Europe
- potownrob
- Master Standardshifter
- Posts: 7833
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 11:35 pm
- Cars: '17 CX-5 GT
- Location: Dutchess County
Haha, wishful thinking, Peterbilt
As for the low and aggressive gearing of the Civic EX, I used to regularly achieve 30 to 35 mpg in mixed driving. Once I really got good at driving stick (we're talking a couple years back now) I stopped getting above 30 mpg , but my mileage never fell below 30, even when I revved the bejesus out of that engine
I've gotta say, though, that the higher and wider gearing of the lower economy models is a bit pathetic, and they don't get that much better gas mileage, maybe 35-40
As for the low and aggressive gearing of the Civic EX, I used to regularly achieve 30 to 35 mpg in mixed driving. Once I really got good at driving stick (we're talking a couple years back now) I stopped getting above 30 mpg , but my mileage never fell below 30, even when I revved the bejesus out of that engine
I've gotta say, though, that the higher and wider gearing of the lower economy models is a bit pathetic, and they don't get that much better gas mileage, maybe 35-40
ClutchFork wrote:...So I started carrying a stick of firewood with me and that became my parking brake.
-
- Senior Standardshifter
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:14 pm
- Contact:
-
- Master Standardshifter
- Posts: 1524
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 12:45 am
- Location: Earth (twilight zone maybe?)
- Contact:
Good thinking Peter.
Yeah, once again, I think IF manual is at least U.S. $10000 cheaper than automatic, then we will see some boosts in manual purchases, BUT at the same time we may see some money losses in car dealerships as well .
Now I wonder on average how much cheaper does it cost for buying manual compare with buying automatic in Europe.
Yeah, once again, I think IF manual is at least U.S. $10000 cheaper than automatic, then we will see some boosts in manual purchases, BUT at the same time we may see some money losses in car dealerships as well .
Now I wonder on average how much cheaper does it cost for buying manual compare with buying automatic in Europe.
-
- Junior Standardshifter
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 5:08 am
- Location: Merced, California, USA, North American, Earth, Solar System, etc.