Which one? The 2.7 twin turbo is pretty grunty. The mileage my friend gets isn't spectacular, but grew tries to hoon around in his large brick on Wheels.AHTOXA wrote:I remember driving a rented Expedition with the EcoBoosted double-snail configuration. That thing really moved out of it's way and then some, given that it's like a 7500 lb truck or some such.
I wouldn't mind an EcoBoost F150 truth be told.
Are non sport turbo cars fun?
-
- Master Standardshifter
- Posts: 4029
- Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:04 pm
- Cars: 17 Mazda6 To, 18 Mazda3 i
- Location: Shakopee, MN
Re: Are non sport turbo cars fun?
- AHTOXA
- Master Standardshifter
- Posts: 14693
- Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 6:31 pm
- Cars: '19 4RUNNER TRD ORP
- Location: Irving, TX
Re: Are non sport turbo cars fun?
The 3.5 twin turbo is the one I drove. It was a hoot.tankinbeans wrote:Which one? The 2.7 twin turbo is pretty grunty. The mileage my friend gets isn't spectacular, but grew tries to hoon around in his large brick on Wheels.AHTOXA wrote:I remember driving a rented Expedition with the EcoBoosted double-snail configuration. That thing really moved out of it's way and then some, given that it's like a 7500 lb truck or some such.
I wouldn't mind an EcoBoost F150 truth be told.
'19 Toyota 4Runner TRD ORP
'12 Suzuki V-Strom 650
'12 Suzuki V-Strom 650