Fox Body Mustang -- this one's for Inline Paul

General discussion about cars. Looking to buy a new car? Have a great driving story? Post it here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Shadow
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 3384
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:51 am
Location: New York

Fox Body Mustang -- this one's for Inline Paul

Post by Shadow »

Not sure if you're a fan of The Smoking Tire or not, but the host Matt Farah got himself an ex-patrol car 88 Mustang 5.0 that's about as stripped out as possible. I actually had the same car, minus the notchback. Mine was an 88 hatchback, but it was stripped as well, right down to the A/C delete.

Anyway, I thought this video would be right up your alley:

Image
ClutchDisc
Senior Standardshifter
Posts: 755
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 1:50 pm
Cars: 2009 Mazda 5 2.3L 5MT
Location: Detroit area

Re: Fox Body Mustang -- this one's for Inline Paul

Post by ClutchDisc »

Nice! Image My next car...
09 Mazda 5 2.3 5-speed manual 171k
11 Subaru Forester auto :( 113k
92 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 5-speed manual 151k
Rope-Pusher
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 11612
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:44 pm
Cars: '08 Jeep Liberty
Location: Greater Detroit Area

Re: Fox Body Mustang -- this one's for Inline Paul

Post by Rope-Pusher »

Image

Google "Fox Body Mustang"
'08 Jeep Liberty 6-Speed MT - "Last of the Mohicans"
User avatar
ClutchFork
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 1937
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:55 pm
Cars: 2008 Fusion 2.3L manual
Location: Detroit MI

Re: Fox Body Mustang -- this one's for Inline Paul

Post by ClutchFork »

Thanks Shadow. That is a beautiful car. If it were mine, the only difference would be that I would leave it as is instead of doing the proposed mods to the suspension, paint, and brakes.
Stick shiftin since '77
theholycow wrote:Why in the world would you even want to be as smooth as an automatic? Might as well just drive an automatic...
tankinbeans
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 4029
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:04 pm
Cars: 17 Mazda6 To, 18 Mazda3 i
Location: Shakopee, MN

Re: Fox Body Mustang -- this one's for Inline Paul

Post by tankinbeans »

I don't understand the fox body Mustang love.


That being said, wasn't the Lincoln Mark VIII a fox body?

Image

Drool...
17 Mazda6 Touring
18 Mazda3 iSport
InlinePaul wrote:The driving force of new fangled features to sell more cars [is to] cater to the masses' abject laziness!
Image
IMBoring25
Moderator
Posts: 3418
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 5:01 pm
Location: OK, USA

Re: Fox Body Mustang -- this one's for Inline Paul

Post by IMBoring25 »

It was most closely related to Thunderbird and Cougar, which were no longer on the Fox platform by that time.
ClutchDisc
Senior Standardshifter
Posts: 755
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 1:50 pm
Cars: 2009 Mazda 5 2.3L 5MT
Location: Detroit area

Re: Fox Body Mustang -- this one's for Inline Paul

Post by ClutchDisc »

tankinbeans wrote:That being said, wasn't the Lincoln Mark VIII a fox body?
Wikipedia wrote:The Mark VIII was built at Ford's Wixom, Michigan assembly plant and was based on the FN10 platform, a relative of the MN12 platform which underpinned the 1989–1997 Ford Thunderbird and Mercury Cougar.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln_Mark_VIII
09 Mazda 5 2.3 5-speed manual 171k
11 Subaru Forester auto :( 113k
92 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 5-speed manual 151k
Rope-Pusher
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 11612
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:44 pm
Cars: '08 Jeep Liberty
Location: Greater Detroit Area

Re: Fox Body Mustang -- this one's for Inline Paul

Post by Rope-Pusher »

FORD ANNOUNCES MUSTANG SPECS
Image

"But we’ll start off with Ford which just announced the specs for the all-new Mustang. First up is the powertrain numbers from its three available engines. The standard 3.7 V6 is rated at 300 horsepower and 280 lb.-ft. of torque. The 5.0L V8 cranks out 435 horses and 400 lb.-ft. of torque. And the new 2.3L EcoBoost is rated at 310 horsepower and 320 lb.-ft. of torque. It’s also adding some new content as well. We all know about the independent rear suspension, but it will have bigger and more powerful brakes than before and will also have a performance package for the EcoBoost fastback or convertible and the GT fastback, which upgrades things like the suspension, wheels and brakes. The 2015 Mustang did bulk up a bit though. It added anywhere from 6 to 87 pounds depending on the model. That shouldn’t be too surprising, it did get independent rear suspension and was designed to meet more stringent safety standards. All I can say is I can’t wait to get behind the wheel of one."

https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedi ... ashed.html
'08 Jeep Liberty 6-Speed MT - "Last of the Mohicans"
User avatar
Bill B
Senior Standardshifter
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:32 pm

Re: Fox Body Mustang -- this one's for Inline Paul

Post by Bill B »

Those Lincolns had the auto leveling feature. Was interesting to see some of those cars 15 years later when that feature did not work so well anymore. My old boss has an 87 Cougar that I drove some in the 90's. That car was RWD, and had the worst traction of any car I have ever driven. Had a 6 Cyl engine, but did not really have much get up and go to it.
IMBoring25 wrote:It was most closely related to Thunderbird and Cougar, which were no longer on the Fox platform by that time.
Bill Berckman
West Chester, Ohio
2007 Honda Element EX AWD 5 Speed MT
User avatar
ClutchFork
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 1937
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:55 pm
Cars: 2008 Fusion 2.3L manual
Location: Detroit MI

Re: Fox Body Mustang -- this one's for Inline Paul

Post by ClutchFork »

I would gladly take a late 80s/early 90s Thunderbird if it had a 5.0 and a manual transmission. Great looking car and a bit roomier than the Mustang. At 6'1" I don't mind a little more space.
Stick shiftin since '77
theholycow wrote:Why in the world would you even want to be as smooth as an automatic? Might as well just drive an automatic...
Rope-Pusher
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 11612
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:44 pm
Cars: '08 Jeep Liberty
Location: Greater Detroit Area

Re: Fox Body Mustang -- this one's for Inline Paul

Post by Rope-Pusher »

InlinePaul wrote:I would gladly take a late 80s/early 90s Thunderbird if it had a 5.0 and a manual transmission. Great looking car and a bit roomier than the Mustang. At 6'1" I don't mind a little more space.
Space IS the final frontier, right?
'08 Jeep Liberty 6-Speed MT - "Last of the Mohicans"
User avatar
ClutchFork
Master Standardshifter
Posts: 1937
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:55 pm
Cars: 2008 Fusion 2.3L manual
Location: Detroit MI

Re: Fox Body Mustang -- this one's for Inline Paul

Post by ClutchFork »

Rope-Pusher wrote:
InlinePaul wrote:I would gladly take a late 80s/early 90s Thunderbird if it had a 5.0 and a manual transmission. Great looking car and a bit roomier than the Mustang. At 6'1" I don't mind a little more space.
Space IS the final frontier, right?
That, and at the terrestrial level, without space we wouldn't get very far. :)
Stick shiftin since '77
theholycow wrote:Why in the world would you even want to be as smooth as an automatic? Might as well just drive an automatic...
Post Reply